Vickers

Vickers v. Dance Unlimited, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20212:21-cv-00732California757 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLEVELAND VICKERS, No. 2:21–cv–732–JAM–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 16.) DANCE UNLIMITED, LLC, et al., Defendants. 16 In April 2021, plaintiff filed this ADA case and served defendants Natalia Clarke and Dance Unlimited, LLC. (ECF Nos. 1, 4, 5.) Defendants failed to file an answer with the court, and so in late June plaintiff sought and was awarded an entry of default. (ECF Nos. 6, 7.) However, two days later defendant Clarke filed a document which, liberally construed, indicated she and her business intended to defend the suit. (ECF No. 8.) Later, Clarke moved to set aside the default. (ECF No. 11.) The court held a hearing on July 29, where plaintiff consented to setting aside the default. (ECF No. 11.) Further at this hearing, the parties indicated their desire for the court to refer the case to its Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (“VDRP”). In light of this fact, the court stayed the case and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.