Douglas

Douglas v. Kalanta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20211:21-cv-01535California706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RICHARD WILLIAM DOUGLAS, JR. et Case No. 1:21-cv-01535-NONE-EPG al., ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF DOUGLAS’ v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED WILLIAM JOSEPH KALANTA, et al., (ECF No. 3) Defendants. ORDER REQUIRING ALL PLAINTIFFS TO

FILE APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE NO

LATER THAN DECEMBER 2, 2021

18 Plaintiffs Richard William Douglas, Jr., Christine Anne Hurtt, and David R.L. Henderson, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit on October 18, 2021. (ECF No. 1). On the same day, Plaintiff Douglas filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). (ECF No. 2). Because review of the application indicated that Plaintiff Douglas could afford to pay the filing fee in this case,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.