Dahl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL ADAMS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00852-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO VACATE ORDER GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 24); DAHL, et al., GRANTING DEFENDANTS’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Defendants. (Doc. 28); DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

NOVEMBER 22, 2021, DEADLINE

On August 5, 2021, Defendants filed an ex parte application for an extension of time to respond to the complaint due to the “press of other business.” (Doc. 16.) Pursuant to Local Rule 144(c), the declaration of counsel stated that “a stipulation between the parties cannot be reasonably obtained because Plaintiff is presently incarcerated and cannot be easily contacted about an extension of time.” (Id.) Upon a finding of good cause, the Court…