Rubio

Rubio v. City of Visalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20211:21-cv-00286California7,123 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMUNDO VICENTE RUBIO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00286-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED

PROTECTIVE ORDER

v. (ECF No. 25) CITY OF VISALIA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting or defending this litigation would be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter this Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the specified information or items that are entitled, under the applicable legal principles, to treatment as confidential. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.