Mills

Mills v. Wenger

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20211:19-cv-01425California428 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER MILLS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01425-NONE-EPG 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 WENGER, et al., OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY

(30) DAYS Defendants. 16 17 On October 9, 2019, Christopher Mills, a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, filed this 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). He requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis 19 (IFP) (ECF No. 2). However, Plaintiff’s IFP application did not make the showing required by 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915(a) because the IFP application indicated that Plaintiff had cash but failed to state 21 the total amount of that cash so as to determine whether Plaintiff qualified for IFP status. 22 Accordingly, the Court ordered him on October 16, 2019, to submit a renewed IFP application or 23 pay the filing fee within 30 days. (ECF No. 3). 24 The thirty-day period has expired, and Plaintiff has failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.