Dagostini

(HC) Craig v. Dagostini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20212:21-cv-01226California1,302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, No. 2:21-cv-1226 TLN KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JOHN DAGOSTINI, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner paid the filing fee. As discussed below, the petition should be dismissed without prejudice. Governing Standards Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases allows a district court to dismiss a petition if it “plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court. . . .” Id. The Petition Petitioner alleges the following. In ground one, unidentified parties are circumventing U.S. Mail, legal mail, confidential privileges, and violating Title 15 standards and U.S. Postal Service regulations. (ECF No. 1 at 3.) In ground two, certain correctional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.