Atchley

(HC) Fair v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20212:20-cv-01107California430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH D. FAIR, JR., No. 2:20-cv-1107-JAM-DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER MATTHEW ATCHLEY, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 30, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 30 days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 30, 2021, are adopted in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.