Barnes

Barnes v. Barnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20211:21-cv-01603California363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:21-cv-01603-NONE-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE

v. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCIE BARNES, et al.,

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). (ECF No. 1). The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, be brought only in: “(1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.