Sherman

(PC) Sharpe v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20211:19-cv-00711California1,046 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM SHARPE, No. 1:19-cv-00711-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

C. CRYER, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 65, 71)

17 Plaintiff Adam Sharpe is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. This case proceeds on against defendants C. Cryer, S. Gates, and J. Lewis on plaintiff’s claims of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment based on his allegations that he has a serious medical need for specialized contact lenses due to his suffering from keratoconus, an eye disease that deteriorates his vision, and that despite the defendant prison officials being aware of that need, he still did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.