CDCR
(PC) Virgil v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONDELL EARL VIRGIL, Case No. 2:20-cv-01373-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM
CDCR, et al.,
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
Defendants. DAYS 16 17 On April 20, 2021, I screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint, notified him that it failed to state a claim, and gave him sixty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 20. I subsequently granted plaintiff’s two motions for extensions of time, the most recent extending the deadline to file an amended complaint to October 19, 2021. ECF Nos. 22 & 24. Despite those extensions, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local…