Kernan

(PC) Espinosa v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20211:19-cv-00345California907 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLAUDIA MEDINA, No. 1:19-cv-00345-DAD-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SCOTT KERNAN, et al., (Doc. No. 19) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Claudia Medina was formerly incarcerated at Central California Women’s Facility, where he alleges he was assaulted by employees of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. He asserts that during the assault he suffered violations of his Eighth Amendment rights. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Back on May 3, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations, recommending that certain claims and defendants be dismissed. (Doc. No. 19 at 20–21.) Specifically, the findings and recommendations recommend that plaintiff’s first claim for relief for excessive force in violation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.