Spearman

(PC) Chiprez v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20212:19-cv-00619California435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESUS CHIPREZ, No. 2:19-cv-0619 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M.E. SPEARMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 4, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 35. After receiving an extension of time, ECF No. 37, plaintiff filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations, ECF No. 39. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.