Espinosa

(PC) Maraglino v. Espinosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20211:20-cv-00825California809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOROTHY GRACE MARIE 1:20-cv-00825-GSA-PC

MARAGLINO,

ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY Plaintiff, ASSIGN A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS CASE v. AND

J. ESPINOSA, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

Defendants. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDER

(ECF No. 23.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

20 Dorothy Grace Marie Maraglino (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 21 forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 15, 2020, 22 Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) 23 On September 13, 2021, the court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim, 24 with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (ECF No. 10.) The thirty-day time 25 period has now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.