Rios

(PC) Rosales v. Rios

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20212:21-cv-01758California1,713 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL ROSALES, No. 2:21-cv-1758-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER L. RIOS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition to filing a complaint (ECF No. 1), he has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 2 & 4) and a motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 5). As discussed below, the court grants his application to proceed in forma pauperis, denies his request for counsel, and screens his complaint. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis The court has reviewed plaintiff’s application (ECF No. 8) and finds that it makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). ///// /////…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.