Unknown

(HC) Turner v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20212:21-cv-01160California1,216 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY DEWAYNE LEE TURNER, No. 2:21-cv-1160 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges an armed robbery conviction in the Sacramento Superior Court. Presently before the court are petitioner’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis and his amended petition for screening. For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the motions to proceed in forma pauperis and recommend that the petition be dismissed without leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Petitioner has filed two motions to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 2, 10.) Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.