Santiago
(PC) Arzaga v. Santiago
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL JESUS ARZAGA, No. 2:18-cv-0313 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS E. SANTIAGO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel; he paid the filing fee. By an order filed August 27, 2021, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants Haluik and Victoriano. (ECF No. 83.) That thirty day period has passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order as to defendants Haluik and Victoriano.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants Haluik and Victoriano be dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 Plaintiff, who is not proceeding in forma pauperis, was provided multiple opportunities to 25 identify, locate and serve defendants Haluik and Victoriano. (ECF Nos. 32, 47, 50, 64, 72, 83, 88, 94.) On March 11,…