(PS) Ickes v. Yolo County Health and Human Services/Child Welfare Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20212:21-cv-01276California1,082 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMANDA ICKES, No. 2:21-cv-1276 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

YOLO COUNTY HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES/CHILD WELFARE

SERVICES, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Amanda Ickes is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On September 15, 2021, defendant noticed a motion to dismiss for hearing before the undersigned on October 15, 2021. (ECF No. 9.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) plaintiff was to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion “not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed . . . hearing date.” Plaintiff, however, failed to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. Accordingly, on September 15, 2021, the court issued an order to show cause, ordering plaintiff to show cause in writing within fourteen days as to why this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.