Sutton

(PC) Washington v. Sutton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20211:20-cv-00983California558 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ISAIAH WASHINGTON, 1:20-cv-00983 AWI-GSA-PC Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANTS

M. STURGES, O. NAVARRO, AND J.

SUTTON, et al., CORNEJO FOR USE OF EXCESSIVE

FORCE, AND THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS

Defendants. AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

15 Isaiah Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint names as defendants John Sutton (Warden), M. Sturges (ISU Officer), O. Navarro (ISU Officer), J. Cornejo (ISU Officer), and F. Feliciano (Appeals Coordinator) (collectively, “Defendants”), and brings claims for sexual assault, unlawful strip search, harassment, excessive force,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.