Valley National Bank v. Road Liner LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20211:21-cv-01155California3,279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-1155 AWI JLT ) Plaintiff, ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. ) DEFAULT JUDGMENT ) ROAD LINER LLC, ) (Doc. 11) ) Defendant. ) ) ) Valley National Bank assert that Road Liner LLC breached a contract related to the financing of premiums charged by an insurance company. (Doc. 1.) Because Road Liner LLC has not responded to the allegations in the complaint, Plaintiff now seeks default judgment pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 11.) The Court finds the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. Therefore, the motion is taken under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and General Order 618, and the hearing date of November 16, 2021 is VACATED. For the following reasons, the Court recommends the motion for default judgment be GRANTED. I. Procedural…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.