Clark v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20211:21-cv-00096California724 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN CLARK, No. 1:21-cv-00096-NONE-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO SUBMIT

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING REGARDING

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., SETTLEMENT OF PLAINTIFF’S PAGA BRANDON LLOYD, and AARON CLAIM FLORENCE, (Doc. No. 17) Defendants. 17 On November 5, 2021, plaintiff Steven Clark and defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. filed a joint stipulation for dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice, including plaintiff’s tenth cause of action for civil penalties pursuant to California’s Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”). (Doc. No. 17.) Therein, the parties stated that “after extensive negotiations” they reached an agreement to resolve the action, including plaintiff’s PAGA claim, and intend to serve the stipulation on the California Labor Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”) at the same time that it is submitted to the court. (Id. at 2.) Under California law, the trial court must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.