Halverson

Halverson v. Permanent General Assurance Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20212:19-cv-01272California2,986 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYLER HALVERSON, No. 2:19-cv-01272-TLN-DMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER v.

PERMANENT GENERAL ASSURANCE

15 CORPORATION also known as THE GENERAL ASSURANCE, and DOES 1 16 through 50, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Permanent General Assurance Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss and Strike. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff Tyler Halverson (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 23.) Defendant replied. (ECF No. 26.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On April 4, 2016, Defendant, the insurer, identified Plaintiff as “insured” and confirmed Plaintiff’s Toyota Avalon (“Avalon”) was covered under an insurance policy (the “policy”). (ECF No. 19 at 3.) On June 10, 2016, Plaintiff collided with another vehicle (the “third party”) while driving a 2004 Chrysler Town & Country (“Chrysler”). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.