(PC)Hernandez
(PC)Hernandez v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROCKY HERNANDEZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-01125-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
v.
TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE
REMEDIES
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
21-DAY DEADLINE REHABILITATION, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Rocky Hernandez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. He alleges prison officials have failed to provide him adequate medical care. (Doc. 1.) In his complaint, Plaintiff states that he has not filed an administrative grievance regarding his claims. (Id. at 2.) The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) provides that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under . . . any other Federal law . . . by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Exhaustion of administrative remedies is mandatory and “unexhausted claims cannot be brought in court.”…