Ochoa

(PC) Jones v. Ochoa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20211:21-cv-00038California710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JAQUICE JONES, Case No. 1:21-cv-00038-DAD-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v. 13 (ECF No. 44) VALOR OCHOA, et al., Defendants. 16 Jaquice Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 28, 2021, Defendants filed an objection to producing certain documents that the Court ordered them to produce. (ECF No. 38). On October 19, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Court reconsider its order denying Plaintiff a copy of the witness statements. (ECF No. 44). As to Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, Plaintiff misunderstands what occurred. Plaintiff states that he received an order from the Court stating that “(1) the Confidential Supplement shall be redacted sufficient to obscure the statements made by inmate witnesses; (2) Plaintiff may review the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.