Watrous
(PC) Richson-Bey v. Watrous
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SEAN J. RICHSON-BEY, 1:21-cv-01482-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS BARRED BY
v. HECK V. HUMPHREY, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and EDWARDS v. BALISOK, 520 U.S. 641 (1997). WATROUS, et al., (ECF No. 1.) Defendants. 30 DAY DEADLINE
15 Plaintiff, Sean J. Richson-Bey, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff complains of having been wrongly charged and found guilty of delaying a peace officer in the performance of duties after being issued a Rules Violation Report (“RVR”). (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff alleges that he is completely innocent of this charge; that he was not allowed to present a defense; and that he was found guilty of the Rules Violation and assessed thirty days loss of credit. Plaintiff seeks an order declaring that his constitutional rights were violated and awarding him monetary damages. When a prisoner…