(PS) Griffith v. Paran LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20212:21-cv-01314California532 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL GRIFFITH AND DETRICK No. 2:21-cv-1314-JAM-CKD PS

CURTIS CONERLY,

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.

PARAN, LLP,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Detrick Curtis Conerly proceeds pro se in this action seeking to enforce a foreign judgment.1 This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). By order signed on September 9, 2021 (ECF No. 3), the undersigned screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), advised plaintiff of the deficiencies in the complaint, and recommended the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim and failure to set forth a basis for the court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff Conerly objected to the September 9, 2021 findings and recommendations, noting the complaint asserted diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as its jurisdictional basis. 27 1 Plaintiff Michael Griffith did not sign the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.