(SS) Duron v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20211:21-cv-00149California403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 6 REYNALDA DURON, CASE NUMBER: 1:21-cv-00149-GSA 7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting OPENING BRIEF Commissioner of Social Security,

11 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff moves for an unopposed 60-day extension of time from November 19, 2021 to January 18, 2022 to file an opening brief. This is Plaintiff’s second extension in this case, and first extension request for cause having previously used the 30-day extension provided by the scheduling order as of right. The Scheduling Order allows for a single extension of thirty days by the stipulation of the parties. Doc. 5 at 3. Beyond the single extension by stipulation, “requests to modify [the scheduling] order must be made by written motion and will be granted only for good cause.” Id. When considering whether good cause exists to modify a scheduling order, courts consider the foreseeability of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.