Kirsten Haye v. Ixia Holdings, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20211:20-cv-01810California632 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERIANNE KANE, et al., No. 1:20-cv-01805-DAD-JLT 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE STAYED PENDING IXIA HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., NINTH CIRCUIT DECISION 14 Defendants.

16 YASMIN CHILDS, No. 1:20-cv-01806-DAD-JLT 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE STAYED PENDING

19 IXIA HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., NINTH CIRCUIT DECISION 20 Defendants.

KIRSTEN HAYE, No. 1:20-cv-01810-DAD-JLT Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

v. SHOULD NOT BE STAYED PENDING

NINTH CIRCUIT DECISION

IXIA HOLDINGS, LLC, et al.,

Defendants. 27 28 The above-captioned matters are state-law actions concerning nursing homes’ responses to the coronavirus pandemic. They were initially filed in California state courts and were subsequently removed to this U.S. District Court on the basis of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.