Dunn

(PC) Eckland v. Dunn

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20212:18-cv-01979California342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARNOLD RAY ECKLUND, No. 2:18-cv-1979 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DUNN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 6, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit, and he was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. See ECF No. 9. At that time, plaintiff was given thirty days within which to comply. See id. at 2. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed the required document, nor has he responded to the court’s order in any way. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a District Court Judge to this case. 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.