Martindale

Martindale v. MegaStar Financial Corp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20212:20-cv-01983California4,038 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LAURIE MARTINDALE, on behalf of No. 2:20-cv-01983-MCE-DMC herself and all others similarly situated, 11 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v.

MEGASTAR FINANCIAL

CORPORATION, Defendant. 16 Through the present action, Plaintiff Laurie Martindale (“Plaintiff”) asserts both individual and class claims against Defendant MegaStar Financial Corporation (“Defendant”) for violation of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, California Civil Code §§ 1788 et seq. (“Rosenthal Act”); violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, California Business and Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. (“UCL”); and breach of contract. First Amended Compl., ECF No. 11 (“FAC”). Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s FAC for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 14. This matter has been fully briefed. ECF Nos. 15, 16, 18. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED in part…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.