(PC)Garrett

(PC)Garrett v. Amador County Sheriff Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20212:21-cv-01624California398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAMEO L. GARRETT, No. 2:21-cv-1624-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

AMADOR COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 28, 2021, the court found that plaintiff had submitted an 19 application to proceed in forma pauperis but had failed to submit a certified copy of his trust 20 account statement as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). ECF No. 5. 21 Accordingly, the court directed plaintiff to submit a certified trust account statement to 22 complete his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. The court also warned plaintiff 23 that failure to do so would result in this action being dismissed. Id. The time for acting has now 24 passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, submitted another application for leave to proceed 25 in forma pauperis, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.