(PC)Stroup

(PC)Stroup v. Hartley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20212:21-cv-01283California375 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KHALID AHMED STROUP, No. 2:21-cv-1283-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ALICIA HARTLEY, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 29, 2021, the court found that plaintiff had submitted only the first page of an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 7. Accordingly, the court directed plaintiff to submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. The court also warned plaintiff that failure to do so would result in this action being dismissed. Id. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, submitted another application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.