Krivolavek

Krivolavek v. BeavEx Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20211:18-cv-01416California2,907 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM KRIVOLAVEK, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-01416-NONE-SKO

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW

v. (Doc. 16)

BEAVEX INCORPORATED,

13 Defendant. _____________________________________/

15 On September 14, 2021, Sabrina A. Beldner, Esq. (“Attorney Beldner”) of McGuireWoods 16 LLP (“McGuireWoods”) filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for Defendant BeavEx Incorporated 17 (“Defendant”). (Doc. 16.) No oppositions to the motion were filed. (See Docket.) After having 18 reviewed the motion and all supporting material, the matter was deemed suitable for decision 19 without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), and the hearing set for October 20, 2021, was 20 vacated. (Doc. 17.) For the reasons set forth below, Attorney Beldner’s motion to withdraw will 21 be granted. 22 I. BACKGROUND On September 14, 2018, Plaintiffs William Krivolavek, Kosal Pech, and Patricia Gutierrez (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated this wage-and-hour action in the Superior Court of the State of 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.