Newsome

(PC) Ramirez v. Newsome

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20211:21-cv-01389California193 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-0389-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

J TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(Doc. No. 14) GAVIN NEWSOME, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is detained at Atascadero State Hospital and filed a pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint on September 16, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff submits a declaration regarding his 19 financial circumstances in support of his request to proceed in this action in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 14). That declaration satisfies the requirements under § 1915. Plaintiff as a civil detainee not a prisoner within the Prison Litigation Reform Act and not subject to payment of the 22 filing fee under § 1915(a)(2). Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED. °° Dated: _…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.