Partanen

Partanen v. Western United States Pipe Band Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20211:21-cv-00588California313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN ERIC PARTANEN, Case No. 1:21-cv-00588-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

v. (Doc. 69) WESTERN UNITED STATES PIPE BAND ASSOCIATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff John Eric Partanen (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on April 8, 2021. (Doc. 1.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal filed on November 15, 2021. (Doc. 69.) The Court construes the motion for voluntary dismissal as a request for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), “a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quotation and citation omitted). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.