Santoro

(PC) Hardy v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20211:21-cv-00327California1,188 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTIN HARDY, No. 1:21-cv-00327-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND

DECLINING TO ADOPT IN PART THE

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS

KELLY SANTORO, et al., (Doc. Nos. 16, 18) Defendants.

16 Kristin Hardy (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint against all named defendants for violations of plaintiff’s First and Fourth Amendment rights in connection to strip searches conducted between January 1 and January 6, 2019. (See Doc. No. 16.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 7, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 18.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.