(HC) Martin v. People of the State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VERDELL MARTIN, Case No. 21-cv-05345-WHO (PR) cone v. ORDER OF TRANSFER
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
Respondent.
Petitioner Verdell Martin, who is housed at CSP-Solano in the Eastern District, S 14 || alleges he is entitled to 866 days of time credits. (Pet., Dkt. No. 1 at 3.) Though he was || convicted in San Francisco County here in the Northern District, a petition involving a 16 || parole or time credit claims should be heard in the district of confinement, which here is
= || the Eastern District. 28 U.S.C. $§ 1404(a), 2241(d); Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(2); Dunne v. || Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, this federal habeas action is TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District || of California because that is the district of confinement. The Clerk shall transfer this || action forthwith. IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 || Dated: November 15, 2021 4VU.Qe …