Crounse

(PC) Villery v. Crounse

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20211:18-cv-01623California1,526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED M. VILLERY, No. 1:18-cv-01623-NONE-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING

D. CROUNSE, et al., (Doc. 99) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jared M. Villery is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 25, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion to compel the production of documents. (Doc. No. 67.) On July 16, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge denied the motion as untimely. (Doc. No. 87.) Plaintiff now requests reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s ruling pursuant to Local Rule 303(c). (Doc. No. 99.) Defendants filed an opposition to plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration on September 23, 2021. (Doc. No. 101.) Plaintiff has not filed a reply to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.