Pogue

(HC) Martin v. Pogue

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20211:21-cv-01622California1,224 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JARED ANDREW MARTIN, Case No. 1:21-cv-01622-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER LEAVE

TO AMEND

v.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER,

TO SEND PETITIONER BLANK § 2254

Respondent. FORM

16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I. DISCUSSION Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (“Habeas Rules”) require preliminary review of a habeas petition and allow a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is ordered to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. A. Habeas Jurisdiction A claim falls within the “core of habeas corpus” when a prisoner challenges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.