Kernan

(PC) Harris v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20212:17-cv-00680California7,188 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS, No. 2:17-cv-0680 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS S. KERNAN, et al., Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a former state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and is proceeding in forma pauperis. Defendant M. Kuersten’s motion for summary judgment is before the court. As discussed below, the motion should be granted. II. Plaintiff’s Allegations Plaintiff has myriad medical issues,2 and received numerous medical exams and tests, 24 Defendant Kuersten is the sole remaining defendant. Following screening (ECF No. 22), 25 plaintiff consented to the dismissal of defendants Dr. Yuen, Voong, Dr. Largoza, Guillory, and Wamble on December 31, 2017 (ECF No. 24), and such defendants were dismissed without 26 prejudice on January 10, 2018 (ECF No. 28). On January 12, 2018, defendant J. Clark Kelso was also dismissed. (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.