Kibler

(HC) Green v. Kibler

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20212:21-cv-01397California360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARVON D. GREEN, No. 2:21-cv-1397 JAM KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER BRIAN KIBLER, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On November 10, 2021, petitioner filed a notice and request for ruling, claiming that due to respondent’s failure to timely respond petitioner’s habeas petition should be granted. However, on November 5, 2021, respondent timely sought an extension of time to respond, which was granted by the court on November 9, 2021.1 On November 12, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. On November 15, 2021, petitioner objected to the court granting petitioner a seven-day extension of time, and complained that while the respondent was granted sixty days to respond, petitioner was only granted thirty days to reply. Petitioner does not appear to seek an additional sixty days in which to oppose 26 1 In any event, default judgments are not available in federal habeas corpus actions. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.