Medina
Medina v. Mapes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRADLEY MEDINA, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00844-NONE-EPG Plaintiffs, v. ORDER RE: NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF
COURTNEY L. MAPES, M.D., AMERICA WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND
AMENDING CAPTION
Defendant. (ECF No. 13) 16 On November 17, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss Defendant United States of America.1 (ECF No. 13.) Therefore, pursuant to Plaintiff’s notice, this case is dismissed only as to Defendant United States of America. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). In light of the dismissal, the caption is amended as set forth above. /// /// /// /// 26 1 The stipulation does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice. (See ECF no. 13.) “Unless the 27 notice or stipulation states otherwise, the dismissal is without prejudice. But if the plaintiff previously dismissed any federal- or state-court action based on or including…