(SS) Luna v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20211:20-cv-01213California8,172 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 MARGARITA V. LUNA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01213-EPG Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

v. SECURITY COMPLAINT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF Nos. 1, 20).

SECURITY,

16 Defendant. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding her application for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. (ECF No. 1, p. 1) The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 11). Plaintiff presents the following four errors: (1) The ALJ committed harmful error by failing to give “specific and legitimate” reasons for rejecting the long-term, treating RFC [residual functional capacity] 26 opinions of record from Drs. Gomez and Truta; (2) The ALJ…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.