Asman

(PS) Schmitz v. Asman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20212:20-cv-00195California4,372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS A. ASMAN, et al., (ECF No. 165) Defendants. 16 Presently before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying reconsideration of its original order that dismissed with prejudice plaintiffs’ constitutional claims against defendants Adam Asman and Erik Bradley. (ECF No. 165.) The motion is fully briefed and was taken under submission without oral argument. (ECF Nos. 165- 169.) For the following reasons, the court recommends DENYING plaintiffs’ motion. BACKGROUND On April 14, 2021, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to further amend their complaint to reassert their previously dismissed-with-prejudice constitutional claims of deliberate indifference and deprivation of familial relations, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against defendants Asman and Bradley. (ECF No. 145.) Asman and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.