Dennis

(PC) Hardin v. Dennis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20212:17-cv-01340California387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEON HARDIN, No. 2:17-cv-01340-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER D. BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 On April 5, 2019, this action was voluntarily dismissed because the parties had reached a settlement. ECF No. 32. On August 27, 2021, Plaintiff, who had proceeded without counsel and in forma pauperis in the district court, filed a notice of appeal. ECF No. 53. Thereafter, on November 8, 2021, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred this matter to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for the appeal, or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. ECF No. 58. “An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of in forma pauperis status appropriate where…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.