Beard

(PC) Ashker v. Beard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20211:21-cv-00423California523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TODD ASHKER, Case No. 1:21-cv-01611-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

CONSOLIDATE CASES

v. (Doc. No. No. 63) KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al.,

Defendants. Case Nos. 1:21-cv-00423-NONE-EPG and 1:21-cv-01611-HBK

17 On November 4, 2021, the Northern District of California severed Plaintiff Todd Ashker’s claims against Defendants Allison, Prelip, Paris, and Moak and transferred them to this District pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and joint motion to transfer these claims. (Doc. No. 61, see also Doc. Nos. 59, 60). On November 16, 2021, Defendants moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42 to consolidate this action with Case No. 1:21-cv-00423-NONE-EPG, asserting that the actions involve common questions of fact and noting that the parties agreed in their stipulation that these claims should be litigated in Case No. 1:21-cv-00423-NONE-EPG. (Doc. No. 63). Pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.