Navrrow

(PC) Smart v. Navrrow

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20211:20-cv-00144California1,124 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON SMART, No. 1:20-cv-00144-NONE-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. No. 18) FNU NAVRROW, ET. AL., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Aaron Smart initiated this action as a prisoner proceeding pro se by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 24, 2020. (Doc. No. 1). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 9, 2020 the previously assigned magistrate judge issued a screening order directing plaintiff to file a first amended complaint (“FAC”) within sixty days because his initial complaint did not contain sufficient factual allegations and failed to state a plausible claim. (See Doc. No. 14.) The screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in the dismissal of the action. (Id. at 2.) The screening order further directed the Clerk’s Office to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.