Paramo

(HC) Williams v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20212:13-cv-00417California359 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK JAMES WILLIAMS, JR., No. 2: 13-cv-0417 TLN KJN P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed. On November 17, 2014, this action was stayed so that petitioner could exhaust his unexhausted claims. (ECF No. 31.) Petitioner was ordered to file a status report every 90 days detailing petitioner’s progress in exhausting his unexhausted claims in state courts, and to file a motion to lift the stay of this action within 30 days after the California Supreme Court issues a final order resolving petitioner’s unexhausted claims. Petitioner has not filed a status report. Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed based on petitioner’s failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.