Ciolli

(PC) Barrett v. Ciolli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20211:20-cv-01802California445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY BARRETT, No. 1:20-cv-01802-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING

A. CIOLLI, THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO AMEND

BE DENIED

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 25, 26, 28)

17 Plaintiff Anthony Curtis Barrett is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 29, 2021, plaintiff filed two separate motions requesting the court’s leave to amend his complaint. (Doc. Nos. 25, 26.) On October 4, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motions for leave to amend be denied. (Doc. No. 28.) Those findings and recommendations were served on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.