Frauenheim

(HC) Vasquez v. Frauenheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20212:17-cv-02579California735 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SALVADOR B. VASQUEZ, No. 2: 17-cv-2579 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned requires petitioner to file a status report concerning exhaustion of state court remedies. On March 5, 2018, this action was stayed so that petitioner could exhaust his unexhausted claims in state court. (ECF No. 10.) Petitioner was ordered to file a motion to lift the stay and a motion to amend within thirty days from the date the California Supreme Court issues a final order resolving petitioner’s unexhausted claims. Over three years have passed, and petitioner has not subsequently filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the California Supreme Court.1 25 The court may take judicial notice of facts that are “not subject to reasonable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.