T.

(PC) Roberson v. T.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20211:19-cv-01724California1,601 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARENCE LONELL ROBERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01724-DAD-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO

EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS

v.

ORDER REGARDING SUBSTITUTION OF

L.T., et al., NAMED DEFENDANTS IN PLACE OF

DOE DEFENDANTS

Defendant(s).

14 Clarence Lonell Roberson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect claims against two Doe sergeants and a Doe lieutenant, and on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants KQA, Gonzalez, the two Doe sergeants, the Doe lieutenant, and two Doe correctional officers. (ECF Nos. 13, 18.) On September 24, 2021, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to file scheduling and discovery statements. (ECF No. 47). The parties have now filed their statements. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.